Litigation lawyer
You build the argument. You meet what dismantles it before the hearing, not during.
Asks
«Is a dismissal issued before the five-day window for the worker's defence has expired defective?»
Conformi/DifformiPraticheEditor
Knowing the law is continuous work.
For anyone who has to know what the law says, keep up when it changes, and decide accordingly.
Ask a question or upload the case file. The AI works across trusted legal sources and your own documents — with every conclusion linked to its source.
2.8 million
rulings in the database
550,000
articles of legislation
+380
new rulings every day
+90
statutes and decrees every day
Add the documents.
Filings, contracts, correspondence, expert reports — scanned too. They enter the case with their dates and who is working on them.
Filings, contracts, correspondence, expert reports — scanned too. They enter the case with their dates and who is working on them.
Working group
- Giulia Ferrari(owner)
- Marco Bianchi(colleague)
- Mario Rossi(client)
- Dismissal_letter_12-03-2025.pdf2 pages
- Disciplinary_notice_14-03-2023.pdf3 pages
- Collective_agreement_extract.pdf14 pages
Timeline3 without evidence
Tuesday 14 March 2023
Disciplinary charge handed to M. Rossi in person
› 2 documents
Wednesday 22 March 2023
The worker files his written defence after the five-day deadline
› 2 documents
Ask in plain language. The answer carries the article and the ruling it came from.
The roof terrace held under exclusive use needs replacing. How do I split the cost between its owner and the other residents?
Article 1126 of the Civil Code puts one third of the cost on the party holding exclusive use, and the remaining two thirds on the residents the terrace serves as a roof, in proportion to their ownership shares. [1]
Sources
- Art. 1126 Civil Code — Roof terraces under exclusive useLegislation
- Cass. civ., sez. II, no. 9084/2014§ 2 · Case law
What are you looking for today?
Write the argument: it comes back split into supporting, opposing and neutral, each with its full reference.
A dismissal for cause is unlawful where the sanction is disproportionate to the conduct alleged.Test it
Supporting3
SupportingCass. civ., sez. lav., no. 12345/202415 March 2024
SupportingCass. civ., sez. lav., no. 4521/20238 February 2023
Opposing2
OpposingCass. civ., sez. lav., no. 6789/202322 June 2023
Neutral1
NeutralArt. 2119 Civil Code — Termination for causeIn force
Pick the template: it comes out already filled in from the case. The AI proposes the passages, you accept or discard them.
Templates
DefenceClaimFormal noticeWrit of summons
Generate documentfrom Rossi vs. Tecnologie Avanzate Srl
Defence under art. 416 c.p.c.
The claimant has challenged the dismissal served on 12 March 2025, pleading want of proportionality between the conduct alleged and the sanction imposed.
The Court of Cassation is settled on this: proportionality is assessed on the concrete gravity of the conduct and the harm caused (Cass. civ., sez. lav., no. 12345/2024).
Proposed by the AI, with its sourceAcceptDiscard
Last edited · Giulia Ferrari, today 14:20 · 3 versions
Add the supporting case law
You can bring in a colleague or an expert, or share with your clients.
Working groupRossi vs. Tecnologie Avanzate SrlShare
Case of Studio Ferrari
- Giulia Ferrarifirm ownerTeam
- Marco BianchicolleagueTeam
- Mario RossiclientRead-only
- Paola Neriexpert witnessPending
Invite by email
consultant@technicalstudio.itInvite
They come into this case, not the whole firm. Read-only seats are always free: a client never pays to see their own case. If whoever was running it leaves the firm, the case stays.
Want to see it on your own way of working?
Try it freeThe AI searches and extracts. You decide. Searching the sources and copying details out of documents by hand takes hours every week.
Advisory lawyer
Every opinion goes out with the rule cited in full, so whoever reads it can check it.
Asks
«Can a manifestly excessive penalty clause be reduced by the court of its own motion?»
Banca DatiChatEditor
In-house legal
The answer the business wants today, with the source at the bottom for when someone disputes it.
Asks
«Can we terminate the framework agreement on thirty days' notice?»
ChatPraticheEditor
Property manager
The code article to show when somebody raises their voice at a meeting.
Asks
«The roof terrace under exclusive use needs replacing: how do I split the cost?»
ChatPraticheBanca Dati
Police officer
Which rule applies, in which version, and from when. Before the report is written.
Asks
«Does the road traffic code apply on private land open to the public?»
Banca DatiChat
Public administration
Acts and circulars that have to survive a legitimacy review.
Asks
«Does an order with no discretionary content still require reasons?»
Banca DatiEditor
Law professor
Supporting and opposing lines of authority side by side, without re-reading thirty years of headnotes.
Asks
«How has the case law on proportionality of dismissal moved from 2015 to today?»
Conformi/DifformiBanca Dati
Employment consultant
Collective agreements, dismissals, contributions: what changed, when, and what applied before.
Asks
«When does the time limit for challenging a dismissal start to run?»
Banca DatiChatPratiche
Small business owner
Understand what the contract actually says, and the advice you were sent.
Asks
«Does this non-compete clause hold without any consideration?»
ChatPratiche
Your clients' files stay yours. A client's file isn't ordinary data. We treat it accordingly.
Your data stays in our infrastructure
OCR and extraction run on our own infrastructure by default: no outside service sees your case files.
No training on your filings
Client documents never feed a model, ours or anyone else's.
Isolation between firms
Each firm sees only its own files, and that separation is checked by automated tests on every release.
Traceability
Every extracted value keeps a link back to the document and the point it came from.
GDPR arts. 9 and 10
Judicial data and special categories, handled as the law classifies them.
Art. 622 of the Criminal Code
In Italy, disclosing a professional secret is a criminal offence. We build accordingly.
Questions The ones asked by people who answer for their own decisions.
What if the AI invents a ruling?
Every citation carries its full reference and a link to the source in the La Tribuna database: you can check it in one click. That is why we always show where a statement comes from.
Are my case files used to train the model?
No. Client documents never feed a model, ours or a third party's.
Where does the database come from?
From La Tribuna, an Italian legal publisher, in partnership with Tolki. Case law, legislation, administrative practice, current commentary and model documents: editorially curated material, not scraped from the web.
Does it work with scanned PDFs?
Yes. There is OCR built in, with a completeness check across the pages: if a document is only partly read, you're told.
Why show me the rulings that go against me?
Because those are the ones that decide the case. Better to find them now than to hear the other side cite them at the hearing.
Is it only for lawyers?
No. It is for anyone who has to know the law and decide accordingly: law firms and in-house teams, but also property managers, local police and public administration. The job changes, the problem does not — find the rule, notice when it changes, and be able to show what you relied on.
Can I let the client into the matter?
Yes. You invite anyone onto a single case by email — the client, a colleague, an agent, an expert. They register and see only that case, and you can revoke the invitation whenever you want.
Does it replace my practice management system?
No. That handles billing, diaries and compliance. Tolki works on the substance: documents, research, issues, drafting.
Where is the data held?
On infrastructure in the European Union, with per-firm isolation and an audit trail over actions on the file.
What happens when I sign in?
We record your early-access request and contact you for a demo. We ask for your name and email: we don't read your mail or your files.
What does it cost?
The workspace is free: matters, documents, timeline, invitations to colleagues and clients. You pay to open the articles and rulings in the La Tribuna database and to use the AI for longer — each plan is worth five times the one below, starting at € 8 a month. Read-only seats are always free: a client never pays to see their own matter.
Early access
We're opening up to a first group of firms in Italy.
We record your request and write to you to arrange a demo around how you actually work.
Do you look after a legal archive?
We are looking for publishers and institutions in other countries who want to bring theirs online on this same technology.